Thursday, June 7, 2018

Energy to Matter (or Mass)

Is there a human purpose beyond procreation that drives the success of the species to shape all other species around it? Is it beyond the realm of our intellectual cognitive abilities that we are able to see humanity within the context of planet Earth and its ecosystems? Could this be a bottleneck for human "free-will"; for our ability to step outside of ourselves and adopt a responsible approach and design for our own future?

Monday, February 6, 2017

Some Thoughts Passing Through




On Economics.........

                    

            Contrary to popular thought markets do not have a brain to think for themselves. Markets are reactions to currents generated by members of our species, and even that of other species, that we, in turn, react to. Markets are, theoretically, an intersection of energies and ideas generated by the most aggressive members of our species, to promote their own interests. That is probably why markets, do indeed, necessitate regulation; to insert a third-party perspective into the initiatives of the most aggressive and dominant representatives of our species.


If you don't plan your trip and just wing it as you drive or ride as a passenger around America, will you ever hit deadends? Will you ever get to a place that you might not be able to get out of? Do tragedies occur in Nature? Is Nature sometimes unpredictable from a human perspective? Why do some people, as seemingly intelligent thinkers, disregard the power and the impact of disruptions to human pursuit and continuity, as being unimportant or of low priority to the welfare of the species, at large, if not the whole? Why would someone contend that, that possibility or its reality is of little consequence, when in the real world, a derailment off of a train track, stops everyone traveling in its cars behind it? {If that is your logic than, of course, you may argue that human social rules still govern that interference, or its rerouting, and should be abandoned - there should be human interference} Why do some thinkers argue against the ancient wisdom of the counsel and councils of the 'wisemen' (however, that was done historically in various societies) and their decisions.}  I also argue that with no rules at all that some humans will kill or maim or rape or harm other humans (and because you have no regulatory system such as police or a big moral brother to watch out for human transgressions) and have no recourse to correct those circumstances when they do happen. It has been that way in recent years, actually as human thugs, both in the U.S. and globally, get away with murder. In these cases, literally and figuratively.

Even corporations incorporate in their sustainable business strategies, and graduate MBA students are taught as part of their curriculum, about the virtues of 'planned obsolescence' and the benefits of planning the obsolescence of a given technology as an inducement for prospective customers' continuing expenditures.












Copyright © 2016 Steven P. Mitchell

Monday, November 28, 2016

Some Ruminations by Me

In the same way that human society has used natural transports (or substrates) available to human congregations in our more distant Neolithic past as part of our habitat choice; are human-made or anthropogenic transports also a highway for organic development? Does all Life require a substrate for chemical and physical recombination, to create new Life – to transduct or transform mass or energy into new innovations of form? Are we really just reacting to forces that shape our habitats, including our own human contribution, that we, in fact, mistake to be the creative brilliance of our species, that produces the human output? It’s a question I have been trying to answer since I was 13, maybe earlier. Life requires containers or platforms for recombination to engender new combinations and structures – to reform mass. Through atomic and subatomic reconstructions, if it has a place, or habitat for physical and chemical forces to affect biological structures, Nature reinvents itself. It appears, in its most elemental sense detectable to a human, it reorganizes its relationship with energy and matter. Are we, as humans, simply a reactive part of that evolutionary scheme of things? Aren’t we, by the very essence of our place in evolution, always at least one step behind, as participants versus observers? The journey begins.



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Tuesday, August 9, 2016

This page is designed to explain the phenomena of human cognitive formations - what I call cognitive materialism. How, and with examples of its assembly from a neurological and introspective understanding, it takes shape. We as humans conceive of concepts, give them a physical life, and extend those concepts into the brains of other humans. That process, as I will illustrate, deserves to be named, cognitive materialism. It consists of the material birth of concepts in the brain.